Using Proctoring Software in Higher Education for Blended Learning: Expectations Vs Reality

Using Proctoring Software in Higher Education for Blended Learning: Expectations Vs Reality

The rapid increase of online learning and institution’s use of remote and blended forms of teaching and learning due to the covid-19 pandemic, higher education institutions are placing an increased emphasis on Remote Proctoring Solutions. Online Proctoring for higher education has also proven to be the most reliable and convenient way to assess and evaluate students. At the same time eyebrows have been raised and the ethical use of these Proctoring Software in Higher Education has been questioned as many faculty members and students felt that proctoring companies were actually policing them in the name of test integrity.

Most recently with Hybrid Learning taking the center stage in the education system, let’s see what expectations does the higher education have from online proctoring for higher education and how much will they deliver?

Expectation: Proctoring Software in Hybrid learning will not be able to identify cheating

Reality: Every institution’s top most concern is test integrity and prevent cheating during exams. Since Hybrid learning has two sets of students so it is expected that remote proctoring tools will not evaluate both set of students equally. Whereas in reality live proctoring solutions have a fair evaluation metric for both students in classroom as well as online. Remote proctored exams are powered with AI that eliminates bias evaluation.

Expectation: It will incur extra cost to implement Exam Proctoring Solutions for Higher Education

Reality: With the help of proctoring tools institutions can actually conduct cost-effective exams as compared to offline exams. In blended learning module every student can take exams irrespective of their geographical location thus saving a lot of infrastructural cost as well as invigilator cost and other miscellaneous expenses. Proctoring solutions are also customized for each institution so that they only have to pay for the no. of exams they conduct.

Expectation: Students have to download and learn an extra software for using Remote Proctoring

Reality: That’s not the case, in reality teachers can create exams and students can take online proctored exams on their existing LMS itself without downloading any new software. This saves the time and effort to learn a new technology and is also more convenient as exams can be taken from the comfort of their homes and protects their system from any virus attacks. This helps to keep all the students on the same page irrespective of their chosen module and promotes unity among peers.

Expectation: Student privacy will arise while evaluating through Online Proctoring Solutions

Reality: This was a big concern even while implementing exam proctoring solutions for higher education while conducting online exams. Companies like uLearn run on ethics and follow strict data security protocols that makes exam time a stress-free time for students. Even in a hybrid classroom data security will not be an issue as ethical proctoring solutions are willing to comply to fair proctoring practices thus creating a secure test taking environment.

No matter which module of education is adopted, proctoring software for higher education powered by its smart AI is flexible enough to blend in and create a fair and secured exam experience for all. Thus it is not only the technology that is presently revolutionizing the exam process but it is the technology of the future!

To know more about uLearn visit: https://ulearn.io/

 

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *